‘How to be a Victim’
Musings on being a “good” victim vs. being a “bad” victim – Or, How you’re kept in ‘your place’ once the abuser is gone
Having lived the nightmare of an abusive relationship for several years, I thought leaving him would be my ticket to freedom – Freedom to behave in whichever way I wanted.
I’m not talking about wild things. Mostly, just not having to justify my every move, or behaviour, – autonomy over my own body. It seemed an amazing prospect, I could go where I wanted to go, dress in whatever way I felt comfortable, and on the most basic level, not being told how to feel.
When my abuser felt bad, everyone else had to feel bad! When he was angry with someone or something, no one else was allowed to be happy either. When he flew into rage, and I got the brunt end of it, my day was ruined, irrespective of what I had planned, or whether I had gotten up, feeling like today could’ve been a good day.
More importantly, however, if on the day following an abusive or violent episode, he determined that now he felt like having a good time, I had to follow suit. If he decided he wanted to carry on the aggression for two or three days in a row, the same was true.
It didn’t matter, whether I was still hurt, bruised, and tired, if he decided that ‘yesterday was in the past’, and I needed to ‘get the f!ck over it’, I did! I couldn’t afford to hold a grudge, or be upset, when he decided I didn’t have a right to do so. Equally, if something else happened in my life, or I got sick, and I wanted to cry, often I wasn’t allowed, or couldn’t, because vulnerability left me open to more abuse, or ridicule.
So in short, my emotions were monitored and my feelings controlled.
Leaving him, would mean regaining ownership and control over my feelings. Right? Right!? …
Wrong!
The ensuing court battles within the family courts, the dealings with the police and subsequent contact with CPS mean, I still don’t “own” my emotions. Wherever I turn, there are rules for me to follow, arbitrary unfathomable etiquette’s to adhere to, and enigmatic guidelines, on which emotions I should display, at any given time.

Being a “good victim”, according to the ladies and gentlemen in law enforcement, Crown Prosecution Service, and the Courts, isn’t simply being a victim of crime, and reporting said event.
No! One must fit into a certain set of criteria, say the correct things to go alongside ones statement, as well as display the correct amount of emotion (and trauma) whilst doing so.
The largely under-trained police officers, for instance, often require you to not only behave in a prescribed manner, to recognise you as a “real” victim, they also prefer you to use certain ‘key words’, in order to trigger the correct response. If you’re in shock, and perhaps too calm, if your coping mechanism is minimisation, or you’re simply confused and overwhelmed, you most likely won’t say those, and give a “good enough” statement.
When dealing with the Police, ideally, you must report incidences as soon as they happen, in order to be taken serious. Anyone who has been a victim of Domestic Abuse knows, how this is intrinsically difficult, if not impossible, but still, if you report things as “crime in progress” – Boom!, you’re on the road to being a “good victim”. Anyone who has done even a minute amount of research into rape and DV, knows however, that victims often do not come forward until years later, and yet, reporting “historic allegations” is always going to result in some sort of disbelief. Now, the Police should be trained in responding to Domestic Abuse ( how successful that has been can be read in various other posts on this blog), so even if you don’t report incidences right away, but after you have, let’s say, fled to safety somewhere, you should still be considered a good victim. This is not necessarily the case.
If you start bothering the authorities with “historic” events, you want to make sure you have compiled your own bundle of evidence, if you want a chance at being taken serious. It is important, when describing incidents, that you describe how you felt at the time, perhaps reliving the emotion you went through, whilst giving your statement.
For most of the officers I have encountered, it is not (good) enough to say, ‘I have been the victim of a crime, I have been assaulted, I have been hurt, I was crying, I said no, I am traumatised, I am still hurting’. Unless you phrase your ‘ complaint ‘ as a serious DV assault, which left you in fear for your life, scared to death, and a quivering wreck, it is likely that even (evidence and/or pictures of) prominent bruises aren’t enough to get the attention of the folks at your local police station, because you simply don’t “act” the part.
When I was living in my abusive relationship, I didn’t realise how much I had become accustomed to living under constant anxiety, under constant threat, and with the knowledge that, at any point, and through no fault of my own, the situation could escalate dramatically. I didn’t realise, how often I was scared for my life, how often my heart was racing, how often I walked home, or into a room with the sense of impending doom in the pit of my stomach.
I had grown so used to dealing with it, coping with it, and telling myself it was ok, that I found it very hard to be emotional, and emotively descriptive when I gave statements to the police. When I was with him, I couldn’t afford to be weak, or vulnerable, crying didn’t help me (on the contrary, it usually only made matters worse), and telling him I was scared or upset, ended in ridicule. So I had gotten used to NOT saying these things. When dealing with the police, usually mere hours after an assault, however, they treated me as though, surely, it can’t have been as bad as I was describing it, if I wasn’t crying and uncontrollably shaking whilst talking about, irrespective of the fact, that when I had run away, or fled to safety, that is how I felt. In their eyes, I did not seem a good enough victim, to even try to help me.
Talking about being raped by him, in front of strangers, usually happens without emotion. I can’t ,and I don’t want to cry in front of complete strangers, whether police officers, court clerks, counsellors, or barristers. Smiling through years of abuse, and reassuring everyone that I was fine, when I most certainly was not ‘fine’, did that to me. I still don’t like spreading my business, still don’t want people to see me as a victim, and still don’t want people to see me as wounded. Emotions, be that anger, fear, anxiety or sadness make us vulnerable, and I try, wherever possible, to not be vulnerable anymore.
Telling someone that I was beaten, choked, and eventually strangled with a belt whilst being raped, without hysterically sobbing, therefore, apparently makes me a “bad victim“.

The jury likes to see emotion, they say.
The jury likes to see how it affected you, they tell me.
Being strong in Crown Court, doesn’t do you any favours, I’m told.
Do they not realise that breaking down, and falling apart, and subsequently having to put yourself back together, takes so much more effort, than not giving into it? Do they not realise that faking a smile takes inordinately less effort, than crying, which is incredibly draining? Do they not realise that memories of the traumatic sort, are incredibly vivid and painful to relive?
Do they really not realise that on the rare occasion, I DO give into it, I struggle lifting myself out of it again? Do people really not realise, that when I end up drinking a bottle of Liquor, with all the consequences on the day after, to wash the pain away, or overdose on prescription strength opiates, sleeping tablets or other prescription medication to drown it all out, the memories are still there the next morning? Unchanged. Falling apart doesn’t make what happened to me go away! On occasion I stand in the shower for hours and scrub myself till my skin bleeds, or burn myself with scalding hot water, because for those five minutes, my skin feels actually clean…But, in the end I feel as dirty as ever, and I suspect, that will only go with time, if ever.
For me, it is easier to not give into the trauma, and keep it securely stored away. I only visit those memories reluctantly, and when I absolutely must. I detach myself as far as I can, and I don’t want to be told, that this is the wrong thing to do. It works just fine for me.
When it comes to the inevitable trauma domestic abuse, and domestic rape inflicts on you, nothing is right or wrong. People cope with trauma and abuse in all sorts of ways, and yet, instead of educating the public and the jury (perhaps by inviting expert witnesses to trials) and judges, we feed their ignorance by reinforcing pathetic stereotypes about who trauma and abuse victims are and how they behave.
What I have going in my favour is my impeccable clean criminal record. Because, you know, a woman with a criminal record doesn’t get beaten… I am also a credible witness because I am highly educated. Because, you know, a woman without formal education is immune from rape, or naturally lies about it. I am congratulated on being articulate. The mere coincidence that my English is deemed acceptable, or indeed, above average, makes me a good witness? Do you realise how pathetic this sounds? Are other foreign women, with fewer English skills than mine, bad witnesses? Less impactive, I’m told. Crying in Spanish, for instance, or Polish, or Urdu, and through an interpreter isn’t as good as crying in English, you see.
Yes! This is just some of the incredible bullshit, people tell me about the “Justice System”, and what it really means, to be a victim.
Going through the Criminal justice system, it is encouraged that you look as vulnerable, as possible, sound as upset and traumatised, as possible, and potentially have professional diagnosis of your Post Traumatic Stress, inflicted through your Domestic Abuse/Domestic Rape.
In the criminal justice system, you are the star act in what can only be described as a perverse circus. It is not the defendant on trial, it is the victim. Whilst the defendant is receiving coaching, various meetings, and at most has some moderately inconveniencing bail conditions imposed on him (unless he is a high profile serial offender already with various previous conviction, in which case he may actually be in custody), the victim is not only unrepresented, since the Prosecuting Barrister is acting on behalf of the public, not, as some believe, for the victim, but often also left in the dark about what to expect, and yet, you are expected to reciprocate in victim-like fashion (i.e. weak and timid) , by blindly trusting the guys with the badge and the cloaks. Asking questions, seeking clarification, expecting any kind of involvement, and indeed complaining about the treatment received in the progress of an investigation, is not only discouraged, it is frowned upon, and occasionally punished.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, if you end up in the family courts over custody issues for your children, visitation rights, or divorce proceedings where children are involved, you are simply a commodity. You are expendable, you are but a pawn in the game everyone else is playing, and your only valued contribution is your money.
In the family courts no one cares about the “victim”. If you inconvenience them enough, to have endured a crime serious enough to be worthy of their attention, you are expected to behave as though it didn’t happen, after all this isn’t about you, it’s about the children, which in this case, equal possessions, equal money. An incident where you were choked and hit in the face, is described as an “altercation“, another, where you were punched with a baby in your arm, deemed an “argument that got out of hand a little”. If you are head to head with your abuser in family court, crying is seen as weak, post-traumatic stress as a liability, and depression as a welfare hazard for the involved children. So if you are a victim of domestic abuse, you are supposed to be the “Detached Victim”.
The “Detached Victim” presents her case in a business-like manner, factually concise and devoid of any emotion to the judge, who may then pass a ruling on how he feels, the crime ought to have impacted on the victim and her children. The Detached Victim keeps her mental health issues, and medical issues arising directly from the crime, to herself, ‘thankyouverymuch’. Should you develop Depression or PTSD, you may go and ask for help, if you absolutely must, but be careful how much you divulge to your GP, should your abuser decide to try and pass you off, as a “Mental case”. If he is presenting himself well and acts charming enough, they will probably believe him.
If you have managed to breakaway early, they ask:
“But where are the bruises?”
If you breakaway later, they ask:
“Why did you stay, if it was as bad as you say?”
If you breakaway too late, they say:
“Why did you stay? You have failed you children! You are a terrible mother!”
And so it goes on, whilst the abusers human rights are held to higher regards, than those of his ex-wife and children, and the victim is forever justifying her behaviour in order to please others, keep her children, her sanity, her home, her life, her family …
The truth is, for some of us, it never ends. Post separation abuse, is common, post separation traumatisation through the “justice system” incredibly common.
When the relationship ends, we don’t stop being victims. It’s just someone else doing the victimisation, or the facilitating.
Now ask me again, why I didnt report this sooner, and why I stayed.
I dare you.



































